|
 |
|
|
HHO Gas Vs. Biofuel On The Destruction Of Biological mixture
Although HHO gas has more advantages over any other brand of fuel alternative, Virgin Atlantic has become one of the first airlines to do a biofuel test flight. An indication that earth's biological diversity will be further messed up to our harm. One of the airline’s 747 flew from Heathrow to Amsterdam without passengers on board, supposedly powered with a new kind of biofuel which making is claimed not to contend with food and drinking water resources. Sir Richard Branson CEO of Virgin, thumping his chest, said about the median biofuel flight: “Flying our 747 on bio-fuel 10 months earlier than planned is a major breakthrough,” The anxiety about the claim of the advantages of this new biofuel and its effect on agriculture and aquaculture is that the true story of the bio-fuel are currently secret. Though, word is out that the true story will be made public next month. I hope they keep to their promise and that the details show that its cheaper and cleaner than HHO gas, which is only a blend of water and gas, a hydrogen-on-demand alternative fuel made by your car or any engine as it runs. However , true information from The Boeing Co. show that the test flight, another of which will take place next month is a joint project between them, General electric Co. the manufacturers of the Jet engine and the Virgin Atlantic. It should be plain to you that big business is looking for a way of remaining in business, not a way of making life easier for you as does HHO gas technology. For the time being, Sir Richard Branson, quite upbeat about the “clean fuel” project, says: “This breakthrough will help Virgin Atlantic to fly its planes using clean fuel sooner than expected. The demonstration flight next month will give us crucial knowledge that we can use to dramatically reduce our carbon footprint. Virgin Group pledged to invest all its profits from its transportation companies towards developing clean energy and with this breakthrough we are well down the path to achieving our goals.” The bio-fuel in question is said not to be ethanol, which is credited to burn fine at altitudes where other biofuels may freeze. So one wonders what it is. However, reports from the BBC indicate that while biofuels may play a role in the lessening of climate change, they may create environmental troubles unless implemented with care. This view was credited to Britain’s Royal Society. This Society suggested in recently available report that current EU and UK policies are not really well positioned to reduce emissions and therefore asked for more research into all aspects of biofuel production and use. But ironically, no mention was made of HHO gas. Even though this gas has the power to be the real alternative fuel to help relieve and manage greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel burning. The Society is encouraging the British government to promote cutting-edge and carbon-efficient technologies. It went as radical, in its report, as suggesting the use of financial incentives or penalties to make companies comply. The the morckery of it all is that if the citizens were encouraged to embrace Water for gas or the production of hydrogen-on-demand HHO gas with their own cars, only 4 gallons of water is enough to drive an average car in a whole year. This will neither impact negatively on water or food supply, but no effort is made towards promoting HHO gas because of obvious implications it will impose on big business and the world economy as they see it. The respected Professor John Pickett of Rothamsted Research institute, the chair of the Royal Society study, had this to say in conclusion: “Biofuels could play an important role in cutting greenhouse gas emissions from transport, both in Britain and globally, but it would be disastrous if biofuel production made further inroads into biological diversity and natural ecosystems. We must not create new environmental or social problems in our efforts to deal with climate change.” The question I ask, therefore, is why go to all this trouble of possibly endangering us further with biofuel production for blending with gas when the same is achievable with minimal quantity of water? A quart of water will make enough HHO gas to power a car for months without any harmful tail end emissions, because its end result is water.
----------
Jackson Neshah is an expert webmaster and has succeeded in writing several helpful articles on issues such as Water For Gas Fuel Alternative Vs. Hydrogen Fuel Cells If you have had enough of the gasoline exorbitance then go take advantage of WATER FOR GAS save money, improve your engine power and MPG as you run your cars and other engines with HHO - water. This article is free if Author bio remains intact.
|
|
 |
|
No reactions yet.
Please login or sign up to rate this intel.
Please login or sign up to add a comment.
The copyright for this content entitled "HHO Gas Vs. Biofuel On The Destruction Of Biological mixture" has been specified by the contributor as:
All Rights Reserved
This content may not be copied, distributed or adapted by anyone under any circumstances.
|
|
|
This intel was contributed by odidis
|
May, 2012
2008
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2009
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2010
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2011
January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December
2012
January, February, March, April, May
|
|
Not a member yet?
Qondio is a powerful network for making it online. If you have a website to
promote, we can help.
Sign up and get in on the action.
|
|
Welcome to Qondio! Discover the awesome power this network can deliver by going to our About page. Or you could skip straight to the Sign Up form.
|
|
